Weblog

Sunday, 06 September 2009

  • Toward a practical theology of singleness and dating

    Singleness.  Many modern pastors have spoken and written on the subject.  Unfortunately, not many of them agree.

    I was speaking about this yesterday morning with a friend over a Chik-Fil-A Chicken Breakfast Burrito.  (I know you didn't need to know that last bit, but I really liked it.)  He was talking about the dating scene (such as it is) at Southern Seminary.  Southern is infamous for girls who are there working on their M.R.S. degree.  (That, unfortunately, makes it hard on girls who are solely there to get an education.)

    There are many pastors and authors in Reformed Christianity whose belief is that, if you're of marriageable age and you want to be married, you should be pursuing marriage.  This practically works out a lot of times as: find a girl, see if you're somewhat compatible, and close the deal.

    I understand where a lot of these guys are coming from.  They're responding to the casual dating atmosphere of our culture today and the attitude of a lot of guys who want to "enjoy their singleness" for as long as possible.  I think these pastors are right to react to these attitudes.  They aren't biblical.

    However, I don't know that the whole "pursue marriage now" attitude is helpful either.  What it practically does is produce a highly charged atmosphere.  Southern is a case in point.  This weekend, my friend attended an event that was put on because some girls on campus were complaining that guys weren't talking to them.  The guys, it turns out, didn't want to talk to them for fear of being pegged as "one of those guys". 

    "Those guys" are guys who go from one girl to another at Southern, trying to find a wifey.  So, guys who may want to build friendships with girls to try and see if a girl may actually be a good prospect feel that they can't because of what the girl may think.  And I know of girls on that campus who do think that way.

    So, while I see where pastors are coming from in saying that single people should be actively pursuing marriage.  However, I don't think this is a necessary implication from Scripture and practically may be unhelpful.  Neither should men sit around and do nothing or have a heart attitude of "having fun while they can".

    I told my friend that one of the great contributions that someone could make to Reformed circles would be to come up with a practical theology of singleness and dating.  It would make things a lot easier on us single folks.  I, for one, would like to be able to get to know a girl without all the weirdness and pressure (or perception thereof).

    What do you think?  Am I right?  Completely off-base?

    Disclaimer:  Many of my friends may find this whole post laughable.  I certainly haven't always done a good job of fleshing this all out.  I'm much more chill about the whole thing than I used to be.  But, it's still all pretty hard.

Saturday, 08 August 2009

  • Free grace?

    Christians often use the term 'free grace' to describe the grace of God.  And, in one sense, this phrase is absolutely accurate.  We can do nothing to earn God's grace.  It is freely given.

    However, we live in an age where antinomianism permeates the church.  Antinomianism is what famous armchair theologian Bid Manning called "credit card theology".  This heresy says that a person can have faith in Christ and yet, live however they want.  After all, Christ has paid for our sins.

    I confess that I am prone more toward this sin than toward legalism (though I can be quite a good legalist, too).  I tend to think of God as an indulgent grandfather in the sky who turns a blind eye toward our sin.  This is quite dangerous.

    Grace, in fact, is incredibly costly.  Our sin incurred such a debt to God that we could never pay it.  In order to pay the debt, Christ came to earth to live a perfect life and absorb all of God's wrath in his death on the cross.  The debt our sin left was absorbed by God.

    Don't skip over this.  We as humans expect, when someone sins against us, for them to pursue our forgiveness (and rightly so).  However, God, the offended party, pursued guilty men with his love and paid the debt that was owed to himself!

    Let's put some skin on this for a minute:  Have you ever hurt someone badly with your sin?  I mean, hurt their heart.  Deep.  When this happens, if they choose to graciously forgive you, they absorb the hurt.  You hurt them and they charge you no debt.  (Note: This is only truly possible because Christ absorbed all of God's wrath on the cross.  The person has no power to forgive in the deepest sense of the word apart from Christ's perfect work on the cross.)  Yet, the person's hurt does not go away. 

     

    This is where the analogy breaks down.  It is good for explaining the cost of forgiving grace, yet God is perfectly satisfied in Christ's work on the cross.  In a temporal sense, this means that, when we repent, God fully forgives us with full satisfaction on his part.

     

    The beauty of the gospel is that God absorbed the debt that was owed to himself.  Grace is free.  And grace is costly. 

Monday, 11 May 2009

  • Soul food

    Sang this on the Lord's day in church:

    Be still, my soul - your God will undertake
    to guide the future as he has the past
    Your hope, your confidence let nothing shake
    All now mysterious shall be bright at last
    Be still, my soul - the waves and winds still know
    his voice who ruled them while he dwelt below

    Mmmm...

Tuesday, 28 April 2009

Friday, 24 April 2009

urredeemed28

  • Visit urredeemed28's Xanga Site
    • Name: Blake
    • Gender: Male
    • Member Since: 8/22/2008

Weblog Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.

About Me

  • Pastoral student currently in seminary.

Pulse

Photostrip

[no photos]

Recommended

[no recommendations]

Chatboard (1)